The 110 three-track sliding window is an exterior-window option for projects that prefer lateral movement without an inward sash sweep. The documented base combines thermal-break aluminium, profile walls of at least 1.8 mm, 5 + 12A + 5 mm tempered insulating glass and Bogao hardware. For a useful factory quotation, show the complete opening and individual sash arrangement, including the screen. Track count alone does not state the clear opening, panel sequence or screen position. Compare the proposed layout with the room and elevation before selecting optional glazing.
Where this product fits
- Low-rise residential buildings
- Self-built housing
- Shopfront and rental-housing projects
- Rooms where inward sash projection is undesirable
Standard configuration
Glass, hardware, finishes and structural configuration can be matched to the opening size, building context and performance target.
Strengths and application limits
Strengths
- Sliding operation does not project into the room or interfere with curtains.
- Three-track configuration supports a broad opening route.
- Thermal-break construction provides a basis for project thermal review.
- Typically a more value-led route than the documented 110 casement series.
Application limits
- Multi-track sliding seals generally provide less compression than casement seals.
- Tracks and drainage paths require routine cleaning.
- Locks and safety measures must be reviewed for the building use and risk profile.
- The stated size limits are preliminary series references, not automatic approval for wind or structural performance.
Available configurations
- Panel layout: provide an elevation showing the intended active and fixed portions, the travel direction and the screen arrangement. Ask for the resulting clear opening on the returned drawing; do not assume three tracks mean every part of the opening becomes unobstructed.
- Size check: review width, height and area together. A reference sash 2,000 mm wide by 1,500 mm high would be 3.0 m², which exceeds the separate 2.2 m² reference. The individual maxima therefore cannot be combined as one automatically approved sash.
- Glazing alternatives: compare the standard glass with requested Low-E or laminated glass on the same sash layout. Any changed build-up needs a matching review of glass support, hardware and operation; request the applicable evidence rather than assuming a thicker option upgrades every performance measure.
- Hardware and upkeep: the documented package lists an automatic lock, quiet rollers and two-point locking. Confirm the selected set and maintenance access. Keep tracks and drainage routes accessible; additional interior trim should not obstruct their intended function.
- Quote scope: return the opening marks, quantities, panel drawing, glass, finish, screen and lock scope, packing and delivery basis. If comparing with the 110 casement, retain the same project requirements and identify differences in opening action and sealing rather than comparing only the series number.
Finish colours and hardware brands or models can be customized to the project, with physical samples and a configuration schedule confirmed before ordering.
Product media
Questions buyers ask
What does the 110 three-track price depend on?
The actual opening and sash sizes, panel arrangement, glass, finish, hardware, screens, quantities and delivery scope must be specified. This page does not publish a universal square-metre rate because unlike configurations would not be comparable.
Can I order a 2,000 × 1,500 mm sash from the listed maxima?
Not by combining those maxima. That rectangle is 3.0 m² and exceeds the listed 2.2 m² area reference. A proposed size must meet the configuration review as well as all relevant dimensional constraints.
Does a three-track layout guarantee a two-thirds opening?
Not from track count alone. Confirm the actual panel arrangement, screen location, stops and clear opening on the proposed drawing. The approximate two-thirds description of the separate 40×18 interior door must not be transferred to this window.
When should I compare a casement alternative?
Compare it where sealing, exposure or other project performance requirements are central. The supplied references describe different sealing characteristics, but the decision requires applicable evidence for the complete proposed units, not an unsupported universal ranking.
Related products and buyer guidance
- 110 Thermal-Break Integrated Screen Casement Window
- 40×18 Slim Three-Panel Synchronized Sliding Door
- 40×65 Slim Interior Sliding Door
- 17 Questions to Ask a Window and Door Supplier Before Ordering
- Cavorlen 110 Casement vs Three-Track Sliding Window: Compare the Actual Configurations
See the project examples and application solutions.
Send opening sizes, project location, quantities and performance requirements to receive a system recommendation, configuration, quotation and delivery plan.
Submit project requirements ↗