Factory glazing and site glazing are not product options selected by preference; each is a different engineered chain from glass manufacture to permanent support and verified installation.

A large glazed frame passes factory inspection but cannot turn through the building access route. Another project ships frame and glass separately, then discovers that the system's site-glazing sequence, clean environment, temporary restraint and qualified labour were never designed. The question ‘factory or site glazed?’ arrived too late. Unitisation must be resolved while dimensions, glass build-up, frame joints, transport supports, lifting points, façade access and installation tolerances can still change—using verified mass and centre-of-gravity data, manufacturer instructions and a competent lift and temporary-works plan.

Engineering and lifting boundary: This is a coordination framework, not a glass/frame design, lifting plan, method statement or installation instruction. The responsible façade/structural designers, exact glass and window-system manufacturers, logistics specialists, principal contractor, competent lift planner and site safety team must approve the configuration, temporary/permanent support and every handling operation.

1. Define the actual assembly options and decision authority

Describe options precisely: fully factory-glazed frame; factory-glazed sub-units joined on site; unglazed assembled frame with site-installed IGUs; knock-down frame assembled and glazed on site; or mixed strategy by opening mark. Identify which joints, gaskets, sealants, setting blocks, beads, drainage features, hardware and inspections occur in each location. ‘Site glazed’ is not one repeatable process.

Confirm that the exact system manufacturer permits each route at the proposed size, glass build-up, orientation and exposure. Obtain controlled fabrication and glazing instructions, component schedules and warranty/inspection conditions without assuming a catalogue section covers field assembly. Assign design, manufacture, logistics, lifting, temporary works, installation, inspection and release responsibilities in writing.

Set decision timing and hold points. Unitisation affects section/joint design, factory equipment, packaging, container/rack layout, erection plant, façade access and programme. A late logistics preference cannot override engineering or silently move factory quality tasks to an unprepared site team.

Unitisation option definition
Option/mark groupFactory-completed scopeSite-completed scopeSystem approval/evidenceDecision owner/status
Fully glazed unitFrame, glass and defined sealsPosition/fix/interface[exact instruction/design][record]
Glazed sub-unitsSubframes/glazingStructural joining/interface[joint/design evidence][record]
Frame shipped unglazedFrame/fittingsGlass, blocks, beads/seals[site-glazing route][record]
Knock-downMachined componentsAssembly, seal and glaze[field-assembly approval][record]
Mixed strategyPer schedulePer schedule[mark-specific controls][record]

2. Build the mass, support and system-design baseline

Create an engineer- and manufacturer-reviewed model for every handling state: bare frame, individual lite/IGU, factory-glazed unit, transport rack, lifted assembly and installed unit. Use verified dimensions, component masses and tolerances; calculate mass distribution and centre of gravity for the actual configuration. Include temporary bars, lifting frames, packaging and accessories where they travel with the load. Do not estimate from area alone where frames, laminated glass, hardware or offsets matter.

Map permanent and temporary load paths. Factory-glazed transport can impose racking and vibration conditions unlike installed service; site glazing can expose an unglazed frame to instability or require temporary restraint before glass contributes whatever action the designed system permits. Only the responsible designers may state whether glass participates structurally, whether joints can be site-made, and how the frame remains stable at every stage.

Verify glass processor and system constraints: edge support, setting/blocking concept, orientation, edge protection, contact materials, glazing sequence, drainage, gasket/sealant process and replacement route. These must come from exact approved system and project documents; this guide supplies no dimensions or capacities.

State-by-state engineering input map
Handling stateVerified mass/CoG sourceSupport/load pathTemporary conditionApproval
Factory assemblyBOM/calculation/weighing planJig/table/system supportsUnglazed/glazing sequence[manufacturer/designer]
Packed transportUnit + rack + protectionRack/restraints/vehicleShock/racking/environment[logistics engineer]
Unload/stageLifted package/unitEquipment/standsWind/access/exclusion[lift/site team]
Hoist/positionExact lifted configurationLifting attachment/load pathDynamic/proximity effects[competent planner]
Permanent installCompleted assemblyAnchors/support/interfaceUntil final fix/cure[structural/façade designer]

3. Prove the transport, access and lifting route end to end

Survey the route from factory work cell through doors, cranes, rack and container/vehicle envelopes, ports, site gates, laydown, building openings, hoists/scaffolds and final façade position. Use packaged dimensions and swept envelopes, not nominal frame dimensions. Record clearances, rotations, gradients, floor/ground capacity questions, overhead/proximity hazards, weather exposure and rescue/contingency access.

Develop the lifting method through the legally responsible competent party. UK HSE guidance under LOLER says lifting operations involving lifting equipment must be properly planned by a competent person, appropriately supervised and carried out safely; equipment must be suitable, strong/stable and appropriately examined. HSE's planning guidance calls for risks, people, equipment, location, environment, attachment/detachment, overload and continuing integrity to be addressed proportionately.

Do not select vacuum lifters, cranes, slings, spreaders, lifting lugs or frame attachment from load mass alone. Surface condition, glass build-up, pad layout, orientation, redundancy, dynamic effects, radius, wind, temperature, power loss, rated capacities and manufacturer limits matter. A window supplier's lifting sketch is not automatically the contractor's project lift plan.

End-to-end movement route register
StageEnvelope/access evidenceLoad/support evidenceHazard/constraintOwner/status
Factory to rackWork-cell/door/turn surveyApproved handling pointsProduct damage/people[record]
Road/containerPacked envelope and load planRack/restraint/vehicle designRoute/acceleration[record]
Unload/storageSite access/laydownPlant/ground/stand designWeather/segregation[record]
Vertical/horizontal moveHoist/crane/scaffold envelopeLift plan/equipment capacitiesWind/proximity/exclusion[record]
Final placementOpening/interface clearanceTemporary/permanent supportRelease/detach sequence[record]

4. Compare quality risk at the location where work occurs

Factory glazing can offer controlled fixtures, cleanliness, process equipment and inspection, but adds transport mass, large-unit handling and the risk that concealed transit damage or frame distortion reaches site. Site glazing can reduce transport/lift mass per movement and allow replacement sequencing, but transfers cleanliness, weather, access, storage, workmanship, sealant conditions, temporary stability and inspection tasks to the project environment.

Write parallel inspection and test plans. For factory work: component identity, frame geometry, setting/blocking, glass orientation, seals, drainage, operation, cure/hold conditions, packing and pre-dispatch release. For site work: delivered frame and glass identity/condition, storage, opening and support readiness, environmental limits, access, approved sequence, edge protection, process checks, final operation and interface inspection. Preserve hidden-stage evidence before beads, caps or finishes conceal it.

Define damage and nonconformance routes. A chipped edge, rack shift, frame twist, broken IGU, contaminated seal, missing component or out-of-tolerance opening requires containment and authorised disposition. Do not field-adjust, reblock, drill, lift through hardware or substitute a glass build-up merely to keep the crane programme.

Factory versus site glazing risk comparison
Decision factorFactory-glazed evidenceSite-glazed evidenceProject disposition
Process environmentControlled work cell/recordsWeather, cleanliness and access controls[preference/condition]
Transport/liftHeavier complete unit/rack routeSeparate frame and glass movements[engineered route]
Temporary stabilityDuring pack/transport/liftUnglazed frame and glazing stages[temporary-works design]
Quality visibilityFactory hold points/packing releaseSite hidden-stage inspections[ITP]
Damage/replacementComplete-unit consequenceComponent storage/handling consequence[contingency]
Programme interfacesEarlier design/factory freezeSite readiness and trade sequence[programme owner]

5. Run a mark-specific decision and execution gate

Score options only after mandatory constraints are closed. A weighted comparison may consider system permission, structural/temporary design, factory capability, route feasibility, lifting/access resources, environment, quality evidence, programme, replacement and cost—but cannot trade away a failed safety or engineering gate. Record assumptions and sensitivity; one strategy need not cover every opening.

Release each mark group with approved drawings and BOM, handling-state masses/CoG, system glazing instructions, factory/site ITP, packaging and transport design, route survey, competent lift plan, temporary-works and permanent-interface design, labour/competence, weather limits, emergency/contingency plan and responsibility matrix. Verify plant and site readiness before dispatch, not when the truck arrives.

At execution, use identified units and controlled hold points: factory release, rack/load release, site receipt, pre-lift briefing and checks, opening/support readiness, placement and temporary restraint, permanent fixing, glazing where applicable, cure/closure, operation/interface inspection and as-built handover. A successful lift is not evidence that permanent installation or product performance is approved.

Unitisation release gate
GateRequired evidenceStop conditionAuthority/status
System/designExact configuration and approved routeUnapproved joint/glazing state[designer/manufacturer]
Mass/load pathVerified state model and supportsUnknown mass/CoG/stability[engineer]
Route/logisticsSurvey, rack/vehicle and access designEnvelope/capacity unresolved[logistics]
Lift/safetyCompetent plan, equipment and examinationsPlant/weather/people mismatch[lift authority]
QualityFactory/site ITP and hidden hold pointsReadiness/environment failure[QA]
Interface/handoverPermanent support, fixing and inspectionTemporary state/open NCR[project release]

FAQ

Are factory-glazed units always higher quality?

No. Factory controls can be advantageous, but the exact process, inspection and transport chain must be evidenced. A factory-glazed unit can still be unsuitable for the route, lift or interface.

Is site glazing safer because each piece is lighter?

Not automatically. It changes the number and type of handling operations and introduces site storage, access, temporary stability and glazing-process risks. A competent project assessment must compare the complete sequence.

Can glass weight be estimated from square metres?

Preliminary estimates are not a release basis. Verify the exact glass build-up, dimensions, frame, hardware, temporary components and tolerances, then establish mass and centre of gravity through the approved engineering route.

Can suction cups be selected from the unit weight?

No. The competent lift plan must address exact glass and surface, pad arrangement, orientation, environment, redundancy, equipment ratings and manufacturer instructions, among other project factors.

Who decides lifting points on a window frame?

Only the responsible designers and exact system/equipment manufacturers within the competent lift-planning route. Hardware or convenient frame holes must not be assumed to be lifting points.

May the strategy change to site glazing after fabrication?

Only after full change review of system permission, frame stability, glass/process instructions, packaging, route, lifting, site competence, quality plan, programme and warranty/contract effects.

Does placement in the opening complete the work?

No. Temporary restraint, permanent support/fixing, interfaces, glazing/sealing, inspection, operation and handover may remain. Keep each release state separate.

Continue the project review

Connect this guide with the proposed window and door systems, then review how Cavorlen approaches manufacturing and quality control. When your schedule is ready, send it through the project review form.

Official sources used

UK HSE — Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations overview ↗UK HSE — Planning and organising lifting operations ↗UK HSE — Construction lifting operations ↗UK HSE — Safe use of lifting equipment, ACOP L113 ↗UK HSE — Managing health and safety in construction, CDM 2015 ↗IMO/ILO/UNECE — Code of Practice for Packing of Cargo Transport Units ↗ISO — ISO 1496-1 freight containers specification and testing ↗

Related buyer guides

Editorial boundary

This article does not select factory or site glazing; calculate glass thickness, unit mass, centre of gravity, wind load, deflection, suction-pad capacity, sling angle, crane radius, ground bearing, temporary restraint, frame joint, setting block, bite, edge clearance, sealant or anchor; prescribe lifting points or equipment; approve glass contact, site storage, weather limits or worker access; or certify installed performance. No size or weight limit is universal. All engineering, system compatibility, lifting and safety decisions require exact project inputs, manufacturer instructions and competent authorised professionals under applicable law.